Get the latest update on our Vizio court case
Until July 17ᵗʰ, we'll direct1 newly initiated Sustainerships & SFC donations to our software right-to-repair work & efforts to resolve Bambu Lab's AGPLv3 violations!
$36,852 raised!
$213,155 to go!

Help us reach this goal so we can dedicate long-term full-time SFC staff on our software right to repair work for 3D printers, & take action on Bambu Lab's AGPLv3 violations!

On Elastic, its fork, MongoDB, and the SS Public License

by Bradley M. Kühn on January 29, 2021

Now that Elastic adopted SS Public License, folks have been asking us if Conservancy's view on the SS Public License has changed. It hasn't, and our previous two blog posts on MongoDB's license change and Copyleft Equality are still relevant. The only statement we'd like to add is:

To our knowledge, there is no individual nor organization who has yet agreed that they will run a project under the SS Public License and be themselves bound by the SS Public License. That license remains a disingenuous proposal until it's put to use in an “inbound=outbound” licensing configuration.

(Both Elastic and MongoDB require inbound contributors to give them special licensing rights.)

Meanwhile, on the orthogonal issue of whether a forked project should choose a non-copyleft or a copyleft license, we refer everyone to this excellent old keynote from Martin Fink about how copyleft makes project governance better and easier.

Tags: conservancy, GPL, law, licensing

Please email any comments on this entry to info@sfconservancy.org.

Other Conservancy Blog entries…